As you guys have already been told, clubs need to be holding their contests starting in August.
If they want to see the rules or judging forms for Tall Tales, we have them posted on our resources page.
We also have a DEC meeting coming up in about a week. At that time, we’ll want to finalize all the area contest dates. If you’re an AG, you’ll want to figure out how many of your clubs are competing in the next week so you’ll know if it would make sense for you to plan a contest together with another area.
We were discussing evaluations and judging recently. It was suggested that we might increase participation in the contests if we make a point about judging.
Having judged well over 20 contests in the past couple of years, I’ve overheard a variety of responses from contestants after the fact. Many take it as well as could be expected. Sometimes some folks feel like the judging was biased or that they really should have been the one to win.
If you look at the way the judging forms work, you’ll see it’s a weighted tally. So theoretically, a contestant who got all 2nd place votes could win if there were no other contestant who consistently was picked as 1st. That’s why we don’t take time into account until after voting is done.
Based on this system, it’s nearly impossible for a bias to sway the result. It would require a bias from most of the judges. If you think about it, most judges really do want the best person to win. As a judge, I’ve always taken pride in hearing that I picked the consensus winner. Otherwise I start to question my judging skills. Additionally, if the best speaker doesn’t go to the next level, we reduce our chances that we’ll win at the next level. After all, we wouldn’t want to send our 3rd best speaker to Region or International, would we?
There are always mistakes made. That’s why we have an appeal process. Aside from those rare occasions, this is pretty much the most fair judging model there is.
I recently read about a speaker who constantly blamed the judging for their inability to advance. One year, he finally realized that all he could do was worry about the part he has direct control over and let the rest go. That was the year he went much further than he ever had before. I really wish I could remember who that person was. If you know who I’m trying to think of, please leave a comment below.
The point is that it might be worth mentioning to potential participants that they’ll get a fair shake. It’s probably not an issue for most people but it might get a few more to participate that wouldn’t otherwise. If it helps, let them look at the judging form ahead of time.
And if you’re an AG, make sure you’re ready for scheduling your contest at the DEC meeting next Saturday.